Hindi Qalam Times

Malegaon Verdict: All Accused...

By Qalam Times News Network Synopsis: All accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, including...

Operation Sindoor Sparks Fireworks...

Synopsis : Operation Sindoor and the Pahalgam terror attacks ignited fierce debate in...

Disenfranchisement Sparks Political Storm:...

Synopsis: Disenfranchisement takes center stage as INDIA bloc challenges Bihar’s Special Voter Roll Revision,...

Operation Sindoor Sparks Fierce...

Synopsis: Operation Sindoor triggered a heated Lok Sabha debate as opposition leaders demanded transparency...
HomeBig StoryPresident’s Rule Extension Sparks Stormy Debate in Lok Sabha

President’s Rule Extension Sparks Stormy Debate in Lok Sabha

Synopsis: President’s Rule extension in Manipur dominated Lok Sabha proceedings on July 30, with fiery exchanges between the ruling party and Opposition, raising issues of constitutional crisis, ethnic violence, and political accountability.

 Qalam Times News Network

New Delhi, July 30, 2025

President’s Rule took center stage in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday as the House adopted a statutory resolution to extend central rule in Manipur for another six months. The motion, introduced by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, triggered an intense and emotionally charged debate over the handling of the northeastern state’s ongoing ethnic crisis.

President’s Rule

From the outset, Opposition MPs hammered the government over what they called a “failure of federalism.” Congress MP Dr. A.B. Akoijam, himself from Manipur, questioned the moral legitimacy of the move, saying the imposition of President’s Rule served more to shield the BJP from embarrassment than to restore order. “Why was no MP from Manipur allowed to speak when this began? Is Manipur not a part of India?” he asked, demanding dissolution of the Assembly and a fresh mandate instead of prolonging executive control.

Adding fuel to the fire, DMK’s C.N. Annadurai opposed the resolution, while TDP MP Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayulu took a more tempered stance, calling the extension “a hard but necessary step” and urging fellow members to see it as “a moment of national healing.” He compared the situation to post-Article 370 Jammu and Kashmir, suggesting that central intervention could pave the way for long-term peace and development.

Minister of State for Home Affairs Nityanand Rai responded to criticism by highlighting the drop in violence post-President’s Rule and outlined arms seizure operations and anti-drug measures as evidence of progress. Meanwhile, the Congress continued to raise issues beyond Manipur. K.C. Venugopal condemned the arrest of two nuns in Chhattisgarh as a “Bajrang Dal vendetta,” calling on the Centre to intervene.

By day’s end, despite procedural disruptions and repeated adjournments, the motion passed, cementing New Delhi’s grip over Manipur till early 2026. However, unresolved questions about representation, justice, and the government’s real intent hung thick in the air.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments